Help needed BSoD when installing Hyper-V / ATI HD4670

This topic has 34 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 3 months ago by Anonymous.

Viewing 34 reply threads

Author
Posts
- 6th December 2009 at 14:01 #43943
  resil
  Hi,
  
  i disovered a problem with hyper-v and my gfx ati4670.
  
  Following scenario:
  1. Server 2008r2 installed
  2. ATI Driver (Win7 x64 Version 9.9) installed
  3. Hyper-V Roles installed
  4. Reboot
  5. BSoD with Stop Error for atimdag.sys
  
  Need help.
- 7th December 2009 at 00:32 #50213
  JingoFresh
  Its a problem with your particular driver version.
  
  Try using an earlier or later version.
- 7th December 2009 at 00:32 #60032
  Anonymous
  Its a problem with your particular driver version.
  
  Try using an earlier or later version.
- 7th December 2009 at 16:51 #50214
  resil
  Thx for the quick response.
  
  I’ve tried drivers from 9.9 down to 9.5 and installed the modded 9.11 for desktop gfx.
  
  All the same problem.
  
  Normaly i don’t need the ATI driver. I just want the high res. of 1920×1080. But with the standard-vga-driver max. res. is 1400×1050.
  
  Did anybody know how to get the widescreen resolutions with standard vga dirver?
  
  Thanks in advance.
- 7th December 2009 at 16:51 #60033
  Anonymous
  Thx for the quick response.
  
  I’ve tried drivers from 9.9 down to 9.5 and installed the modded 9.11 for desktop gfx.
  
  All the same problem.
  
  Normaly i don’t need the ATI driver. I just want the high res. of 1920×1080. But with the standard-vga-driver max. res. is 1400×1050.
  
  Did anybody know how to get the widescreen resolutions with standard vga dirver?
  
  Thanks in advance.
- 7th December 2009 at 19:30 #50215
  JingoFresh
  Hmmm
  
  I have a 3650 IIRC, and run at 1680×1050 without a problem.
  
  Are you on a laptop or a desktop?
- 7th December 2009 at 19:30 #60034
  Anonymous
  Hmmm
  
  I have a 3650 IIRC, and run at 1680×1050 without a problem.
  
  Are you on a laptop or a desktop?
- 7th December 2009 at 19:53 #50216
  resil
  Thx for your response.
  
  I’am on a laptop (Dell XPS16).
  
  Last thing i’ve tried was
  
  1. Starting hyper-v on demand (sc config hvboot start= demand)
  2. Reboot
  3. Install ATI driver
  4. Reboot (Gfx fine)
  5. Starting Hyper-V (net start hvboot)
  6. BSoD 🙁
  
  Also i tried to force resolution by registry (Default.XResolution / YResolution) -> Take no affect.
  
  Sorry what’s “IIRC”?
- 7th December 2009 at 19:53 #60035
  Anonymous
  Thx for your response.
  
  I’am on a laptop (Dell XPS16).
  
  Last thing i’ve tried was
  
  1. Starting hyper-v on demand (sc config hvboot start= demand)
  2. Reboot
  3. Install ATI driver
  4. Reboot (Gfx fine)
  5. Starting Hyper-V (net start hvboot)
  6. BSoD 🙁
  
  Also i tried to force resolution by registry (Default.XResolution / YResolution) -> Take no affect.
  
  Sorry what’s “IIRC”?
- 8th December 2009 at 00:52 #50217
  JingoFresh
  OK, Are you using the mobility modder driver, or do you not need it?
- 8th December 2009 at 00:52 #60036
  Anonymous
  OK, Are you using the mobility modder driver, or do you not need it?
- 8th December 2009 at 07:49 #50218
  Indrek
  @resil wrote:
  
  Sorry what’s “IIRC”?
  
  It’s short for “if I recall/remember correctly”.
- 8th December 2009 at 07:49 #60037
  Anonymous
  @resil wrote:
  
  Sorry what’s “IIRC”?
  
  It’s short for “if I recall/remember correctly”.
- 8th December 2009 at 08:01 #50219
  resil
  @Indrek:
  Thx
  
  @JingoFresh:
  I’ve modded the ATI 9.11 driver version with the mobility modder and get the same result (Hyper-V + ATI Driver = BSoD)
  Which driver do you use?
  
  Btw.
  Did anybody know if there is an “modded” standard-vga-driver to support 1920×1080 on Server 2008R2?
  
  Thanks in advance
- 8th December 2009 at 08:01 #60038
  Anonymous
  @Indrek:
  Thx
  
  @JingoFresh:
  I’ve modded the ATI 9.11 driver version with the mobility modder and get the same result (Hyper-V + ATI Driver = BSoD)
  Which driver do you use?
  
  Btw.
  Did anybody know if there is an “modded” standard-vga-driver to support 1920×1080 on Server 2008R2?
  
  Thanks in advance
- 8th December 2009 at 16:35 #50220
  JingoFresh
  Hmm
  
  I’m using driver 8.650.0.0, and Hyper V and games work fine.
  
  I would suggest trying this driver?
- 8th December 2009 at 16:35 #60039
  Anonymous
  Hmm
  
  I’m using driver 8.650.0.0, and Hyper V and games work fine.
  
  I would suggest trying this driver?
- 9th December 2009 at 12:02 #50221
  resil
  Hi,
  
  i’ve tried your driver version. No affect.
  
  Looks like i have to use the uncomfortable resolution 🙁
- 9th December 2009 at 12:02 #60040
  Anonymous
  Hi,
  
  i’ve tried your driver version. No affect.
  
  Looks like i have to use the uncomfortable resolution 🙁
- 9th December 2009 at 16:52 #50222
  JingoFresh
  My theory is that the old driver is still on there somehow.
  
  Make sure you remove it completely from device manager, and selecting to delete driver files.
- 9th December 2009 at 16:52 #60041
  Anonymous
  My theory is that the old driver is still on there somehow.
  
  Make sure you remove it completely from device manager, and selecting to delete driver files.
- 11th December 2009 at 17:59 #50223
  resil
  Th edriver could not be there. I’ve installed the W2K8R2 into an VHD and made a backup after clean install. All tests are made on the clean install.
  
  Regards,
  Sascha
- 11th December 2009 at 17:59 #60042
  Anonymous
  Th edriver could not be there. I’ve installed the W2K8R2 into an VHD and made a backup after clean install. All tests are made on the clean install.
  
  Regards,
  Sascha
- 12th December 2009 at 02:02 #50224
  JingoFresh
  So you have a low resolution by default? It seems odd that it is always the same file.
  
  What triggers the crash exactly? Is it reproducible?
  
  What is the name of the exception you get when it bluescreens?
- 12th December 2009 at 02:02 #60043
  Anonymous
  So you have a low resolution by default? It seems odd that it is always the same file.
  
  What triggers the crash exactly? Is it reproducible?
  
  What is the name of the exception you get when it bluescreens?
- 21st December 2009 at 16:05 #50225
  timofcourse
  Participant
  I can confirm that this an issue here as well.
  
  I have the same scenario w/ two different core i7 laptops.. one ATI the other Nvidia graphics. Whenver hyper-v role is enabled w/ graphics driver installed; blue screen.
  
  Upon further research I found this post over at Virtual PC Guy’s blog… and it doesnt look good for those of us with newer laptops with Core i7: http://blogs.msdn.com/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2009/11/16/understanding-high-end-video-performance-issues-with-hyper-v.aspx
  
  If anyone has any suggestions to workarounds for this, it’d be greatly appreciated!
- 21st December 2009 at 16:05 #60044
  Anonymous
  I can confirm that this an issue here as well.
  
  I have the same scenario w/ two different core i7 laptops.. one ATI the other Nvidia graphics. Whenver hyper-v role is enabled w/ graphics driver installed; blue screen.
  
  Upon further research I found this post over at Virtual PC Guy’s blog… and it doesnt look good for those of us with newer laptops with Core i7: http://blogs.msdn.com/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2009/11/16/understanding-high-end-video-performance-issues-with-hyper-v.aspx
  
  If anyone has any suggestions to workarounds for this, it’d be greatly appreciated!
- 10th January 2010 at 23:58 #50226
  rickd
  I’m using 1680×1050 using the latest Catalyst drivers, and haven’t run into any problems, although performance does seem worse than it did on 7.
- 10th January 2010 at 23:58 #60045
  Anonymous
  I’m using 1680×1050 using the latest Catalyst drivers, and haven’t run into any problems, although performance does seem worse than it did on 7.
- 11th January 2010 at 00:15 #50227
  timofcourse
  Participant
  @rickd wrote:
  
  I’m using 1680×1050 using the latest Catalyst drivers, and haven’t run into any problems, although performance does seem worse than it did on 7.
  
  Are you running Core i5 or i7 and have Hyper-V enabled?
- 11th January 2010 at 00:15 #60046
  Anonymous
  @rickd wrote:
  
  I’m using 1680×1050 using the latest Catalyst drivers, and haven’t run into any problems, although performance does seem worse than it did on 7.
  
  Are you running Core i5 or i7 and have Hyper-V enabled?
- 11th January 2010 at 00:21 #50228
  rickd
  @timofcourse wrote:
  
  @rickd wrote:
  
  I’m using 1680×1050 using the latest Catalyst drivers, and haven’t run into any problems, although performance does seem worse than it did on 7.
  
  Are you running Core i5 or i7 and have Hyper-V enabled?
  
  i7 with an HD 5870. Hyper-V is not currently enabled, although, when it was enabled, it worked fine (hyper-v kind of hosed my networking, for reasons I haven’t yet determined).
- 11th January 2010 at 00:21 #60047
  Anonymous
  @timofcourse wrote:
  
  @rickd wrote:
  
  I’m using 1680×1050 using the latest Catalyst drivers, and haven’t run into any problems, although performance does seem worse than it did on 7.
  
  Are you running Core i5 or i7 and have Hyper-V enabled?
  
  i7 with an HD 5870. Hyper-V is not currently enabled, although, when it was enabled, it worked fine (hyper-v kind of hosed my networking, for reasons I haven’t yet determined).
- 11th January 2010 at 13:30 #50229
  timofcourse
  Participant
  @rickd wrote:
  
  @timofcourse wrote:
  
  @rickd wrote:
  
  I’m using 1680×1050 using the latest Catalyst drivers, and haven’t run into any problems, although performance does seem worse than it did on 7.
  
  Are you running Core i5 or i7 and have Hyper-V enabled?
  
  i7 with an HD 5870. Hyper-V is not currently enabled, although, when it was enabled, it worked fine (hyper-v kind of hosed my networking, for reasons I haven’t yet determined).
  
  Ah… so youre running on a desktop. These issues are supposedly primarily related to the mobile i5 and i7 CPU’s.
- 11th January 2010 at 13:30 #60048
  Anonymous
  @rickd wrote:
  
  @timofcourse wrote:
  
  @rickd wrote:
  
  I’m using 1680×1050 using the latest Catalyst drivers, and haven’t run into any problems, although performance does seem worse than it did on 7.
  
  Are you running Core i5 or i7 and have Hyper-V enabled?
  
  i7 with an HD 5870. Hyper-V is not currently enabled, although, when it was enabled, it worked fine (hyper-v kind of hosed my networking, for reasons I haven’t yet determined).
  
  Ah… so youre running on a desktop. These issues are supposedly primarily related to the mobile i5 and i7 CPU’s.
Author
Posts

Viewing 34 reply threads

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.